Just a thought, and let me leave it later.

I remember that there had been a theory in developmental psychology about moral thinking.


I don’t remember the theory, but I doubt if I were to construct one, I would have this:


1. In the beginning, we think there are good people and bad people only, good people do good and bad bad. 


2. Then, we find that good people do wrong thing, so we come to say that people are hypocritic. Or less strong, we have a dualist thought about behaviour and thought.


3. Further, we have discovered  some people who are really innocent.  Our new conclusion will then be a retreated dualism that, “It is possible to think and to act differently.  Some people do it more naturally."


4. With more people you meet, you find that you actually don’t have a clue about who are “good" people.  You learn that good people can be weak enough to be bad.  Or, truly, they are just foolish enough to good things in bad ways.  Vice versa (clever — bad — good).  Finally, you don’t have people good or bad, they just are who they are.

廣告

About Johncoal

莊炭頭,黑口黑面,體形龐大,在新區舊區中學任教新新學科。努力學習發聲,並以指導學生找出自己的聲線為業。

發表迴響

在下方填入你的資料或按右方圖示以社群網站登入:

WordPress.com Logo

您的留言將使用 WordPress.com 帳號。 登出 / 變更 )

Twitter picture

您的留言將使用 Twitter 帳號。 登出 / 變更 )

Facebook照片

您的留言將使用 Facebook 帳號。 登出 / 變更 )

Google+ photo

您的留言將使用 Google+ 帳號。 登出 / 變更 )

連結到 %s

%d 位部落客按了讚: